Movement of Scales Framework

• Fairness is easy
• Institutional racism
• Black debate argument
  • regardless if they win the substance, its important for them to win, to advance
  • Don't go for fairness
• defending against crafted proposals make them able to
  • Well versed with legal concepts
  • Able to navigate well prepared opposition (clash)
  • formulate hypothesis and test them (good researcher to test)
• people who do debate go into politics and places of power
• its important for them to test ideas
  • importan for fairness and equality
• john yu
  • supported trumps book
  • wrote justifications of torture of bush
  • legally why its ok to torture innocents
• Neal Katyal
  • argued in front of the supreme court
• Contrast ones that work vs ones that didn't
• Strikes in Paris, weren't able to create a real government
• Debaters can draw an internal link to a movement
  • against identity K's
  • NOt against High Theory because it has impact turns for politics
• Fairness DOES NOT ALWAYS WORK
• Will lose a lot of K Aff's
  • Because the defence isn't warranted
• Gives you the ability to defend the structure of the game as it exists
• not neccessarily for fairness
• that way learning about bolitics is good
• Its okay to be anapolegetically black in debate
  • response: why the game is good and the game is good
• That way you can weigh the game with this
• AT: Can't prove policy debate did it
  • Linearly yes
  • usually won't matter
  • all you need is a theory
  • if you explain the link well, you won't lose on no internal link
  • all about perception, snappy answers important
  • Prepared to beat you in 2 ways
    • Debate changes us
    • debate changes us in a bad way
    • Debate never shapes us
      • Unwinnable
      • debate changes our subjectivity
        • Now you debate how it changes you subjectivity
      • movements in more coherrent than what they giev
• Easier ex. debate the K is easier with a big stick aff
  • Movement arguments can cause external impacts that are large
  • can fall back on offence is larger

Possible arguments

• pathologization disad
  • Those who engage in debate are legally knowlagable
  • taht implies others who debate aren't
  • bad
  • IMPACT
    • Bad Stereotypes
  • Kritiks that topicality has said the the aff isn't legally educated
  • not content, its form
  • Form arguments are about the form, something you said
  • how you present it
  • kritik forces them to read a plan, and by doing that you call them legally stupid
  • by judging peoples proposals based on them (form)
    • Best its
    • worst its authoritarian
    • alternative is to insulate them from critisism
      • This allows for black conservativism which is bad
    • if they give a caselist, its still bad form
    • carl row
      • Policy debate creates a bad person
      • he wanted to make war
      • some skills through policy is bad for some people
• blackness engaging with usfg is bad for moral
  • movement, gives legal expertise to black people to fix it
  • non-unique, people will still do bad things after debate
  • debate is very progressive, and won't produce conservatives
  • even if, plan based debate probably doesn't do that
• Elites bad, don't learn elite language
  • progressive movements use connections with elites to do stuff
  • like slavery and alabama bus supremem court
  • alt allows elites to do whatever with the power,
• New args
  • link turn offence
    • almost always solve the impact to the aff
  • always say what they condemn, can be used strategically for good purposes
    • Full scale abolish bad
    • iteratively test idea
  • does their interp solve it
    • their k has to solve
    • does their kritik affect debate, or just plan based debate
    • if its debate, there is still debate, the neg must respond
  • Get in the logic of the debate, and kritik mindset
    • DO NOT JUMP INTO FAIRNESS
    • impact turn the logic
  • CX IS VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY IMPORTANT
    • they'll ask why plan causes movements
    • having history of people who have left debate
    • gives a factual basis

• Cards
  • College Wiki SPace topic
  • Cal grey flemmings wiki
    • lakey
    • heller
    • han
• CJR isn't good rn real debaters can do it
• Debate Lawyers and they actually did it
  • can actually enact plan
• Public learners
  • Debate exposes us to things we wouldn't have known about
• BaD PEOPLE HAVA REASON FOR DOING BAD THINGS
  • not debate

SHELL

• to show it requires policy
  • usfg
    • NOT ERICKSON
  • enact
  • reform is policy
    • because the counterinterp is not usfg
    • if you get these, then their counterinterp doesn't work
• Then cards from lakey and han
• why the aff won the debate
• If fairness doesn't matter, there is no debate